Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

IN THE MATTER OF SULLIVAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 27, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Petitioner's financial evidence, consisting entirely of an unattested financial disclosure "affidavit" and a single pay stub from the job he obtained in the course of the hearing, failed to satisfy his burden of showing a change in financial circumstances warranting a reduction of the payment schedule ( see Matter of Derrick v. Derrick, 162 AD2d 348, 350, lv denied 76 NY2d 708). We note other evidence indicative of considerable financial resources and earning capacity.