- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. WALKER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Nov 21, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The defendant did not appeal from the original judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Accordingly, on this appeal from the amended judgment, the defendant is jurisdictionally foreclosed from challenging the propriety of the original judgment ( see People v. Oquendo, 286 AD2d 740; People v. Augustin, 286 AD2d 442; People v. Riddick, 269 AD2d 472; People v. Moore, 261 AD2d 421).
The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v. Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833; People v. Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 575) precludes review of his challenge to the amended judgment ( see People v. Gorovoy, 309 AD2d 764; People v. Bennett, 269 AD2d 401).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.