Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. CANAL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Dec 22, 2005
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

CREW III, J.P.

Defendant was observed on Dana Avenue in the City of Albany drinking beer from a bottle. He was arrested for violating the City of Albany's open container ordinance, and a subsequent search of his person revealed nine pieces of crack cocaine. As a consequence, defendant was indicted and charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees. Following a Dunaway/Mapp hearing, where defendant unsuccessfully sought to suppress the cocaine, he pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3½ to 7 years. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant's assertion, where, as here, the police arrest a person for an offense committed in their presence, they are justified in conducting a search incident to that arrest ( see People v. Pantusco, 107 AD2d 854, 855-856 [search incident to arrest for violation of open container ordinance]).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.