Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

GROCE v. GROCE et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
May 6, 1925
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

May 6, 1925. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE WATTS.

The decree of Judge Townsend is satisfactory to this Court under the authorities quoted by him ( Dicks v. Cassels, 100 S.C. 341; 84 S.E., 878. Kerr v. Kennedy, 105 S.C. 496, 500, 505; 90 S.E., 177. Joyner v. Hoffman, 59 S.C. 535; 38 S.E., 174), and also Cromwell v. Simons (C.C.A.), 280 F., 663; 671. Van Horn v. Demarest, 76 N.J. Eq., 386; 77 A., 354. Bolling v. Bolling's Adm'r, 146 Ky., 316; 142 S.W. 387, Ann. Cas., 1913C, 306. Armstrong's Adm'r v. Shannon, 177 Ky., 547; 197 S.W. 950, and it is incumbent that the appellant should satisfy this Court of the correctness of his contention by the preponderance of the evidence, which he has failed to do.

It is the judgment of this Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MESSRS. JUSTICES FRASER and MARION and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE JAS.W. JOHNSON concur.

MR. JUSTICE COTHRAN did not participate.