IN THE MATTER OF NAMER v. MARTINEZ

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The finding that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180 (b) by speeding was supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Mataragas v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 6 AD3d 537). The Administrative Law Judge properly relied upon the police officer's testimony concerning his visual estimate of the speed of the petitioner's vehicle which was confirmed by the reading of the calibrated speedometer in the police vehicle ( see Matter of Clarke v. Martinez, 14 AD3d 612).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.