Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ATKINSON v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division.
Mar 1, 2006
ORDER

J. HOLMES, District Judge

On the first day of March, 2006, the Court conducted a hearing by telephone on the motion to compel (Docket #18) filed by plaintiff. The plaintiff appeared at the hearing through her attorney, Luther Oneal Sutter. The defendant appeared through its attorney, Jeffrey L. Spillyards. Having reviewed the briefs and having heard the arguments of counsel, for the reasons stated on the record during the telephone hearing, the motion to compel is GRANTED. The Court has previously held that the applicable regulations requires the defendant to produce certain documents. Those documents must be produced without delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.