Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

JONES v. HATHAWAY

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.
Mar 9, 2006
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

BERNARD FRIEDMAN, District Judge

Plaintiff has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment entered in defendants' favor [docket entry 58]. "A court may grant a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend if there is: (1) a clear error of law; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to prevent manifest injustice." Intera Corp. v. Henderson, 428 F.3d 605, 620 (6th Cir. 2005). In the present case, plaintiff has failed to show the existence of any of these circumstances and, accordingly, his motion to alter or amend the judgment must be and is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.