CRUZ v. McANENEY

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

To establish entitlement to a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff must show a probability of success on the merits, a danger of irreparable injury in the absence of an injunction, and a balance of the equities in its favor ( see Aetna Ins. Co. v. Capasso, 75 NY2d 860, 862; Regatta Condominium Assn. v. Village of Mamaroneck, 303 AD2d 741, 742; Klein, Wagner Morris v. Lawrence A. Klein, P.C., 186 AD2d 631). Here, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion for a preliminary injunction ( see Cruz v. McAneney, 31 AD3d 54 [decided herewith]).