- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PAPPALARDI v. JONES
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
May 16, 2006
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
It cannot be said that defendant driver's conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident, as a matter of law, merely because his approach into the intersection was regulated by a stop sign whereas there were no traffic control devices regulating plaintiff's approach ( Hernandez v. Bestway Beer Soda Distrib., 301 AD2d 381). The conflicting deposition testimony raises issues of fact, including whether defendant stopped for a stop sign, whether defendant driver's vehicle was already in the intersection when plaintiff approached and whether plaintiff's view of defendant's vehicle was obstructed.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.