- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
FLORIDA BAR v. WOLF, SC04-1374 (Fla. 5-23-2006)
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 23, 2006
Respondent's motion for clarification is hereby denied. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.330 (a motion for clarification shall state with particularity the points of law or fact in the court's decision that the movant believes are in need of clarification).
Respondent's second motion for extension of time is denied.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.