- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
IN THE MATTER OF LAHM v. BLOOMBERG
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
May 25, 2006
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Given the credible medical evidence in the record that petitioner's cancer did not result from his exposure to dust, smoke and debris at the time of the collapse of the World Trade Center and its aftermath, the Board of Trustees' denial of accidental disability retirement benefits had a rational basis. [ See 4 Misc 3d 530 (2004).]
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.