BAILEY v. USF HOLLAND, INC. (M.D.Tenn. 2006)

ALETA TRAUGER, District Judge

For the reasons expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 57; 60) filed by the defendant, USF Holland, Inc., are DENIED, the Motions to Strike filed by the defendant (Docket No. 100; 101; 102), are DENIED, and the Motion to Supplement Responses filed by the plaintiffs is GRANTED.

It is so ordered.