PEOPLE v. MAIELLO

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant did not demonstrate circumstances which would warrant a departure from the presumptive level three risk level assigned to him under the risk assessment instrument ( see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545). The defendant's evidence, while demonstrating that he had made efforts toward rehabilitation and treatment, was conclusory and unsubstantiated. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating the defendant a level three sex offender.