Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. SCHAURER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Sep 22, 2006
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.43). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution with respect to the weight of the cocaine he sold ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Perry, 21 AD3d 1352, lv denied 5 NY3d 884 [2005]). Likewise, defendant's challenge to the constitutionality of Penal Law § 220.43 has not been preserved for our review ( see People v Baumann Sons Buses, Inc., 6 NY3d 404, 408, rearg denied 7 NY3d 742; People v Davidson, 98 NY2d 738, 739-740), nor was the requisite notice given to the Attorney General ( see Executive Law § 71; People v McKeehan, 2 AD3d 1421, 1422, lv denied 3 NY3d 644).