- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SCOTT v. FLEMING
United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division.
Sep 28, 2006
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDER
GLEN CONRAD, District Judge
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is now
ORDERED
as follows:
1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Nurse Phipps shall be and hereby is GRANTED;
2. The motion for summary judgment filed by R. Fleming, D. Braxton, J. Armentrout, K. McCoy, L. Fleming, G. Kendrick, D. Fleming, S. Day, R. Phipps, and R. Boyd shall be and hereby is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
3. The motion for summary judgment filed by M. Thacker shall be and hereby is DENIED;
4. The motion for summary judgment filed by S. Fleming and J. Mullins shall be and hereby is DENIED;
5. All other pending motions shall be and hereby are DENIED;
6. Nurse Phipps, R. Fleming, D. Braxton, and J. Armentrout shall be and hereby are DISMISSED from the case; and
7. The case is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge shall conduct such proceedings as she deems appropriate, including an evidentiary hearing, if necessary, and shall submit to the court a report setting forth findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommended disposition.
The Clerk is directed to send certified copies of this order and the accompanying memorandum opinion to the plaintiff, counsel of record for the defendants, and Judge Sargent.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.