Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SALAAM v. ADAMS

United States District Court, N.D. New York.
Sep 29, 2006
DECISION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE KAHN, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 18, 2006, by the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 44). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Rasool Salaam, which were filed on September 11, 2006. Objections (Dkt. No. 45).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 44) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 33) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.