PEOPLE v. ELEY

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to peremptorily challenge a prospective juror after the defendant had indicated his satisfaction with a venire panel and after the defendant had exercised his peremptory challenges to the panel ( see CPL 270.15; People v Mancuso, 22 NY2d 679, cert denied sub nom. Morganti v New York, 393 US 946; People v Lebron, 236 AD2d 423). The defendant's failure to object to the challenge when made, however, waived the rights secured to him under CPL 270.15 (2) ( see People v Mancuso, supra; People v Lebron, supra).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.