IN THE MATTER OF ONEIL D

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has broad discretion in entering dispositional orders ( see Matter of Yasin H., 31 AD3d 638; Matter of Carliph T., 26 AD3d 440; Matter of Naiquan T., 265 AD2d 331; see also Family Ct Act § 141). Here, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in adjudicating the appellant a juvenile delinquent and placing him on probation, particularly in view of the appellant's poor record of performance, attendance, and behavior at school, and the recommendation made in the probation report ( see Matter of Cesar E., 32 AD3d 1024; Matter of Julissa R., 30 AD3d 526, 528; Matter of Tyrell D., 24 AD3d 440; Matter of Leah G., 23 AD3d 658; Matter of Rosario S., 18 AD3d 563, 564; Matter of Gerald W., 12 AD3d 522; Matter of Steven R., 230 AD2d 745). Contrary to the appellant's contention, he was not entitled to an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal on the ground that "this was [his] first `brush with the law'" ( Matter of Nikita P., 3 AD3d 499, 501 ; see Matter of Cesar E., supra; Matter of Yasin H., supra; Matter of Julissa R., supra at 528; Matter of Rosario S., supra; Matter of Steven R., supra).