MELISH v. MELISH

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of the Supreme Court that the appellant was concealing income, that his failure to pay child support was willful, and that means of enforcement other than contempt would be ineffective is supported by credible evidence in the record ( see Domestic Relations Law § 245; Higbee v Higbee, 260 AD2d 603).

The appellant's remaining contentions are not properly before this Court.

The circumstances of this case do not warrant the imposition of sanctions upon the appellant for prosecuting this appeal ( see Capuano v Platzner Intl. Group, 5 AD3d 620).