Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

AMBROSIO v. 85 CRYSTAL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 27, 2007
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 2006-06718.

Attorney(S)

Larkin, Axelrod, Ingrassia Tetenbaum, LLP, Newburgh, N.Y. (James Alexander Burke of counsel), for appellants. Barry McTiernan Moore, New York, N.Y. (Gary Rome, Anthony McNulty, and Friedman Gaythwaite Wolf Leavitt [Martha Gaythwaite] of counsel), for respondent Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Wolff Samson, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Kenneth L. Laptook and Diana L. Buongiorno of counsel), for respondent PVI Industries, Inc., and Bleakley, Platt Schmidt, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (Andrea J. Smith of counsel), for respondent Protemp Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. (one brief filed).

JUDGES

Edward D. Carni

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied the plaintiffs' motion to vacate the oral ruling is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion to vacate a ruling ( see Hegarty v Bailee, 18 AD3d 705, 706; see Danne v Otis El. Corp., 276 AD2d 581, 582; cf. CPLR 5701 [a] [3]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining the proper scope of discovery ( see Hallahan v Ashland Chem. Co., 237 AD2d 697, 698; Prasad v B.K. Chevrolet, 184 AD2d 626).

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x