Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

FRANKEL v. HIRSCH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 20, 2007
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The trial court's determinations as to the date of dissolution of the parties' partnership, the lawsuits which belonged to the partnership, and the amount of the parties' share of partnership fees are supported by the record, and by its evaluation of the credibility of the parties at the inquest following the striking of the defendant's answer by this Court ( see Frankel v Hirsch, 2 AD3d 399; Partnership Law ยงยง 60, 62 [b]; Briscoe v White, 34 AD3d 712, 713; Morris v Crawford, 304 AD2d 1018, 1020; Grant v Heit, 242 AD2d 247, 248). Accordingly, we find no basis to disturb them.

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.