Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SICURELLA v. EMBRO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 8, 2007
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The "determination of a motion for discontinuance rests within the sound discretion of the court, and is ordinarily granted absent prejudice to a substantial right of the defendant" ( Conte v Getty Petroleum Corp., 202 AD2d 621, 622; Valladares v Valladares, 80 AD2d 244, affd 55 NY2d 388). The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the discontinuance because there was no prejudice to a substantial right of the father. Nor is there merit to the father's argument that the Support Magistrate ordered the discontinuance sua sponte; the record demonstrates that the mother moved to withdraw her claim for child care expenses.

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.