Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

SHANE v. HUMANA

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jun 13, 2007
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

Nos. 06-14222, 06-14497.

Attorney(S)

James B. Tilghman, Jr., Stewart, Tilghman, Fox Bianchi, P.A., Miami, FL, Joe R. Whatley, Jr., Charlene P. Ford, Whatley Drake, L.L.C., Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Kathlynn Butler Polvino, William Bard Brockman, V. Robert Denham, John C. Patton, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer Murphy, Atlanta, GA, Edward Soto, Christopher R.J. Pace, Weil, Gotshal Manges LLP, Stanley H. Wakshlag, Kenny Nachwalter, P.A., Miami, FL, Gregory S. Coleman, Lisa Royce Eskow, Marc S. Tabolsky, Carol A. Funk, Weil, Gotshal Manges, Austin, TX, Thomas C. Zielinski, Coventry Health Care Inc., Plymouth Mtng, PA, James W. Quinn, Jeffrey S. Klein, Weil, Gotshal Manges, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.

JUDGES

Edward Earl Carnes

Charles R. Wilson

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set out in the district court's order granting summary judgment, which was filed on June 19, 2006, except that we do not reach the issue of whether the "plus factors" requirement from antitrust law is applicable in civil RICO cases. Even if that requirement is not applicable, the district court's judgment is still due to be affirmed under the facts and circumstances of this case.

AFFIRMED.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x