KAMINSKY v. SAINT LOUIS

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Richard Kaminsky appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e- 2000e-17, suit against Saint Louis University School of Medicine (SLU). Upon careful de novo review, see Ferguson v. United States, 484 F.3d 1068, 1072 (8th Cir. 2007), we find no reversible error of fact or law. Even if Dr. Kaminsky had been able to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, SLU proffered sufficient nondiscriminatory reasons for its actions that Dr. Kaminsky failed to rebut as pretextual. See Freeman v. Fahey, 374 F.3d 663, 666 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm based upon the district court's well-reasoned and thorough order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.