Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MURPHY v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

United States District Court, D. Colorado.
Jul 11, 2007
ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on the plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Factual Issues [Doc. #31, filed 6/4/07] (the "Motion"). The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on April 13, 2007 [Doc. #25]. The plaintiff filed his response to the motion on May 3, 2007 [Doc. #29], and the defendants filed a reply in support of the motion on May 18, 2007 [Doc. #30]. The Motion does not seek clarification of any factual issues; it is a sur-reply.

The local rules of this court provide that there shall be a motion, a response, and a reply. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Further briefing is not permitted without leave of court. The plaintiff has not sought leave to file a sur-reply, nor does it appear that further briefing is necessary. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Factual Issues is STRICKEN.