- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MURPHY v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge
This matter is before me on the plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Factual Issues [Doc. #31, filed 6/4/07] (the "Motion"). The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on April 13, 2007 [Doc. #25]. The plaintiff filed his response to the motion on May 3, 2007 [Doc. #29], and the defendants filed a reply in support of the motion on May 18, 2007 [Doc. #30]. The Motion does not seek clarification of any factual issues; it is a sur-reply.
The local rules of this court provide that there shall be a motion, a response, and a reply. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Further briefing is not permitted without leave of court. The plaintiff has not sought leave to file a sur-reply, nor does it appear that further briefing is necessary. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Factual Issues is STRICKEN.
Alert