Bookmark
PDF
Share
CaseIQ

BREEN v. TEXAS

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jul 26, 2007

Judgment

Subsequent
References

CaseIQ

Case Information

CITATION CODES

citation codes

DOCKET NO.

Nos. 04-40712, 04-40713, 04-40714, 04-40715, 04-40780 and 04-40812.

Attorney(S)

Steven K. DeWolf (argued), Staci C. Pirnar, Haakon Thomas Donnelly, Bellinger, McManemin, DeWolf, Dallas, TX, for Sean Breen, Christopher Breen, John E. Breen and Marian K. Breen. James C. Todd, Asst. Atty. Gen., General Litigation Div., Bill L. Davis, Ranee Lamar Craft, Ryan D. Clinton, Austin, TX, for Texas AM University, M. Malon Southerland, Russell Thompson, Ray Bowen, William Kibler, John J. Koldus, III, M.T. Hopgood, Jr., Donald Johnson, Zack Coapland, Kevin Jackson, James R. Reynolds, Robert Harry Stiteler, Jr. and Michael David Krenz. R. Ted Cruz (argued), Austin, TX, for M. Malon Southerland, Russell Thompson, Ray Bowen, William Kibler, John J. Koldus, III, M.T. Hopgood, Jr., Donald Johnson, Zack Coapland, Kevin Jackson, James R. Reynolds, Robert Harry Stiteler, Jr. and Michael David Krenz. George E. Hyde, Denton, Navarro, Rocha Bernal, San Antonio, TX, for Texas Ass'n of Counties, Amicus Curiae. Darrell L. Keith, Fort Worth, TX, Jeffrey H. Kobs (argued), Kobs Haney, Fort Worth, TX, for Jacquelynn Kay Self, Kathy McClain Escamilla, Phillip McClain, Andrea Heard, Leslie G. Heard, Matthew Lynn Robbins and Dominic Braus. Eugene Borchardt, McGartland Borchardt, Fort Worth, TX, for Gregory Anthony Powell and Beverly Jill Powell. Nancy Braus, Hallettsville, TX, pro se.

JUDGES

Patrick Errol Higginbotham

Jacques Loeb Wiener

James L. Dennis

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...

Important Paras

Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM:

A majority of the panel having voted sua sponte to grant rehearing, in part, the opinion of the court in disposing of this appeal is as follows:

Section III. A, including its subsections 1 through 3, of the panel opinion, found at 485 F.3d 325, 332-38 (5th Cir. 2007), along with footnote 14, is hereby withdrawn and deleted from the opinion. Other than these withdrawals and deletions, the original panel opinion is reinstated.

DENNIS, Circuit Judge, concurs in the result for the reasons assigned by him in the original panel opinion.