Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

STATE v. McFADDEN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Apr 20, 2007
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25) and attempted robbery in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]). We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's failure to object to the cross-examination of defendant on an unrelated pending charge. In view of the overwhelming evidence against defendant, we conclude that defense counsel's "single failing in an otherwise competent performance [was not] so `egregious and prejudicial' as to deprive . . . defendant of his constitutional right [to a fair trial]" ( People v Turner, 5 NY3d 476, 480; see generally People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712-713). Finally, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).