U.S.A. v. CLEVELAND, 07-7074 (D.C. Cir. 10-1-2007)

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion be denied. The merits of the parties' positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.