STATE v. LAWLESS

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court's determination designating the defendant a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore should not be disturbed ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Glenn, 24 AD3d 427 [2005]). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the assessment of 30 points under risk factor 5 was appropriate ( see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 11 [2006 ed]).