STATE v. MONTALVO

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his designation as a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law § 168-n; People v Hands, 37 AD3d 441; People v Thompson, 31 AD3d 409; People v O'Neal, 26 AD3d 365).