SUZANNE v. DODSON

The determination of an application for interim attorney fees in a divorce action is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court ( Matter of Aronesty v Aronesty, 202 AD2d 240). The court providently exercised its discretion in rendering this award, which appropriately redresses the parties' economic disparity, and which is subject to reexamination at trial ( see Jorgensen v Jorgensen, 86 AD2d 861). We have considered the remainder of defendant's argument and find it unavailing.