Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. TANKLEFF

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 18, 2007
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, and the People are directed to provide the defendant's counsel with access to trial exhibit 125b, consisting of fingernail clippings and scrapings recovered from both hands of Arlene Tankleff, and the known exemplars of the DNA of the defendant, Joseph Creedon, Peter Kent, Jerry Steuerman, and Arlene Tankleff for the purpose of performing forensic DNA testing, within 30 days after service upon the People of a copy of this decision and order.

Under the circumstances of this case, the County Court improperly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for access to trial exhibit 125b, consisting of fingernail clippings from both hands of Arlene Tankleff and scrapings therefrom, as well as the known exemplars of the DNA of the defendant, Joseph Creedon, Peter Kent, Jerry Steuerman, and Arlene Tankleff ( see People v Pitts, 4 NY3d 303, 311; People v Keene, 4 AD3d 536, 537).