MAURICE v. KEITH

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, he was not denied due process because he was not given access to an audiotape of his hearing for his administrative appeal. "[I]nmates do not possess a constitutional right to a tape recording of a disciplinary hearing" ( Matter of Carter v Goord, 271 AD2d 729, 730; see Matter of Rivera v Smith, 137 AD2d 281, 283-284).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.