Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. LEDDY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jan 22, 2008

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 600 (2), beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v Toussaint, 40 AD3d 1017). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power ( see CPL 470.15), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.