- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ROSE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jan 22, 2008
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions concerning the prosecutor's remarks during summation are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Gillespie, 36 AD3d 626 [2007]) and, in any event, are without merit.
Furthermore, since the prosecutor's remarks during summation were proper, the defendant's contention that he received ineffective counsel based solely upon a failure to object to the prosecutor's summation is without merit.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.