BAUMAN v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, ED89824 (Mo.App.E.D. 2-5-2008)

PER CURIAM.

Please substitute the correction on the reverse side of this page in the above-styled appeal handed down on January 29, 2008. This substitution does not constitute a new opinion.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, modifying the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Employer's motion to dismiss claimant's brief is denied as moot.