Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

FILIPINAS v. ACTION AUTO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Feb 26, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

The trial evidence established that within an hour of the accident, Plaintiffs decedent was heavily medicated and/or sedated, justifying the trial court's reasoning that the decedent endured pain and suffering for a limited amount of time. However, contrary to the court's determination, the award for conscious pain and suffering did not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation, where, as a result of being struck in the head by the side mirror of defendants' van, Plaintiffs decedent sustained fractures of the left orbit and right temporal bone, a subdural hematoma and subarachnoid hemorrhaging ( see Twersky v Busche, 37 AD3d 704; Ramos v La Montana Moving Stor., 247 AD2d 333 [1998]).

[See 2007 NY Slip Op 31245(U).]