- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. JEROME
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 4, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court's determination that the explanations provided by the People for exercising peremptory challenges to four black male venirepersons were not pretextual is supported by the record and will not be disturbed on appeal ( see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352, 359; People v Caraballo, 238 AD2d 517). Thus, the defendant's Batson challenge was properly denied.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.