Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

LAWLOR v. LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 25, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Defendants presented no evidence that they sought a certificate of eviction from the Division of Housing and Community Renewal before unilaterally deciding to demolish the building that housed plaintiffs rent-regulated apartment ( see Administrative Code of City of NY § 26-408 [b]; Sohn v Calderon, 78 NY2d 755, 764-765). Moreover, plaintiffs evidence of defendants' harassment raised factual issues as to the alleged necessity of the demolition.

Since, as a rent-controlled tenant seeking restoration to her apartment pursuant to Administrative Code § 26-408, plaintiff has asserted a possessory right affecting real property, her notice of pendency was properly filed ( see CPLR 6501; 220 E. 56th St. Corp. v Excelsior Sav. Bank, 253 App Div 345; Lafayette Forwarding Co., Inc. v Rothbart Garage Operators, Inc., 205 App Div 247, 249-250).