PEOPLE v. SADDLER

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the duration of the order of protection violates CPL 530.13 (former [4]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see People v Bennett, 48 AD3d 1031). We reject the further contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request for youthful offender status ( see People v Lewis, 49 AD3d 1290), and the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.