Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ERMAN v. DOMINION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Apr 29, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

In view of the mixed results of this litigation, in which plaintiffs stipulated to resolve certain remediation claims, but also stipulated to discontinue their personal injury claims, and abandoned their claims based on breach of the lease, plaintiffs cannot be considered the prevailing party in this litigation ( see Real Property Law ยง 234; Mosesson v 288/98 W. End Tenants Corp., 294 AD2d 283).

As to the cross appeal, since the court granted defendant board of managers' motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, there is no necessity for a modification of the order.