STATE v. BAGLEY

PER CURIAM.

Clinton Bagley appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for driving while intoxicated. Bagley complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial. We find no abuse of discretion. As a formal published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).