HARVEY v. WOODS

Petitioner, a prison inmate, attempted to lessen the effects of a chemical agent that was being used by correction officers on another inmate by throwing water into that inmate's face. Petitioner also encouraged the other inmate to continue resisting the officers and to defy their orders. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, demonstration and interference with an employee. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. An unsuccessful administrative appeal prompted petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and corroborating hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it ( see Matter of Rodriguez v Selsky, 47 AD3d 1173, 1173). Contradictory testimony from the other inmate involved in the incident created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Morillo v Goord, 38 AD3d 947, 947-948).

We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly excluded from the hearing, he was denied adequate employee assistance, the hearing was untimely and the Hearing Officer was biased, and, to the extent preserved, find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.