PEOPLE v. CRUZ

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal cannot be considered knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, as the defendant was incorrectly informed, in a preprinted waiver form, that his right to appeal did not include the right to appellate review of his sentence on the ground that it was excessive ( see People v Kurd, 44 AD3d 791, 792). Accordingly, we have considered the defendant's contention that the sentences imposed constituted cruel and unusual punishment, but find that contention to be without merit. There are no exceptional circumstances warranting modification of the sentences, which were within permissible statutory limits ( see People v Jones, 39 NY2d 694, 697; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89, 92; see also People v Peterson, 155 AD2d 487, 488; People v Martinez, 151 AD2d 509; People v DeMent, 144 AD2d 690; People v Buffa, 139 AD2d 751, 751-752).