Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

U.S. v. SANDERS

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi.
Oct 2, 2008
ORDER

DAVID SANDERS, Magistrate Judge

Before the Court are the defendant's Motion for Discovery (doc. no. 24) and the Government's Response to the Defendant's Motion for Discovery (doc. no. 33). The defendant seeks an order requiring the government to produce a laundry list of items she contends she is entitled to under Brady and FED.R.CRIM.P. 16. In response to these items, the government states either that it has already produced the information, will produce it, does not have it, or is not required to produce it at this time. Because the defendant has failed to provide any argument in support of her requests and has offered no reply to the government's representations, the Court construes the defendant's filing as a Rule 16 request for discovery, and the motion shall be terminated from the docket.

SO ORDERED.