PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court improperly assessed points for both the age of the victim and the incapacity of the victim is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v Await, 17 AD3d 336; People v Angelo, 3 AD3d 482; People v Baker, 303 AD2d 570). In any event, the contention is without merit ( see People v Stevens, 48 AD3d 536; People v Davenport, 38 AD3d 634; People v Vaughn, 26 AD3d 776). The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request for a downward departure.