JULES v. CORRIETTE

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the mother's contentions, the record established by clear and convincing evidence that she willfully violated clear and unequivocal court orders, thereby prejudicing the father's right to temporary custody and visitation with the child ( see Rienzi v Rienzi, 23 AD3d 447, 449; Matter of Barcham-Reichman v Reichman, 250 AD2d 609). The Family Court's award of an attorney's fee to the father was also appropriate ( see Matter of Meier v Key-Meier, 36 AD3d 1001, 1004).

The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.