Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

LOPEZ v. INFANTE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 21, 2008
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Where possible, custody should be established on a long term basis, "at least so long as the custodial parent has not been shown to be unfit, or perhaps less fit, to continue a$ the proper custodian" ( Obey v Degling, 37 NY2d 768, 770; see Jackson v Jackson, 31 AD3d 386). Moreover, where parents enter into an agreement concerning custody, it will not be set aside unless there is a sufficient change in circumstances since the time of the stipulation and unless the modification of the custody agreement is in the best interests of the child ( see Smoczkiewicz v Smoczkiewicz, 2 AD3d 705, 706). A noncustodial parent seeking a change of custody is not entitled to a hearing without making some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing ( see Matter of Bauman v Abbate, 48 AD3d 679, 680; DiVittorio v DiVittorio, 36 AD3d 848, 849; McNally v McNally, 28 AD3d 526, 527). Here, the mother failed to make such a showing.

The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.