CAMPO BROS. v. BROOKHAVEN

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We dismiss the appeal from the order dated April 5, 2006 because no appeal lies as of right from an intermediate order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, and we decline to grant leave to appeal in light of the fact that the appeal has been rendered academic ( see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]).

The appeal from the judgment dated October 6, 2006 must be dismissed because the issues raised have been rendered academic by the sale of the subject property pursuant to which the permit at issue was sought, and no exception to the mootness doctrine is argued or present ( see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 713-714).