Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PHILLIPS v. CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan 27, 2009
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 08-16498.

Advocates

John Phillips, Oakland, CA, pro se. Rachel Wagner, Esquire, Office of The City Attorney, Oakland, CA, Michael T. Pyle, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, Jill T. Bowers, Esquire, AGCA — Office of The California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

JUDGES

Diarmuid Fionntain O'Scannlain

Barry G. Silverman

Jay S. Bybee

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Upon review of the record and appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's final judgment. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).

AFFIRMED.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x